Denmark vs Latvia: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Export value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Export value over time
- Denmark
- Latvia
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 81.78 1000 USD against 58.33 1000 USD in Latvia, a difference of 23.45 1000 USD.
That makes Denmark's figure about 1.4 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Latvia ahead.
Denmark ranks 62nd and Latvia ranks 65th of 88 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35.87 1000 USD | 111.63 1000 USD | 75.77 1000 USD | Latvia |
| 2010s | 625.64 1000 USD | 423.41 1000 USD | 202.22 1000 USD | Denmark |
| 2020s | 60.92 1000 USD | 406.52 1000 USD | 345.6 1000 USD | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — export value, Denmark or Latvia?
- Denmark, at 81.78 1000 USD against 58.33 1000 USD in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — export value between Denmark and Latvia?
- 23.45 1000 USD, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Latvia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Denmark and Latvia rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — export value?
- Denmark ranks 62nd and Latvia ranks 65th of 88 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf