Estonia vs Ukraine: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Export value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Export value over time
- Estonia
- Ukraine
How they compare
Ukraine currently reports 8.39 1000 USD against 5.4 1000 USD in Estonia, a difference of 2.99 1000 USD.
That makes Ukraine's figure about 1.6 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 74th and Ukraine ranks 73rd of 88 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,923 1000 USD | 256.82 1000 USD | 1,667 1000 USD | Estonia |
| 2010s | 77.25 1000 USD | 13.14 1000 USD | 64.11 1000 USD | Estonia |
| 2020s | 65.91 1000 USD | 8.39 1000 USD | 57.52 1000 USD | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — export value, Estonia or Ukraine?
- Ukraine, at 8.39 1000 USD against 5.4 1000 USD in Estonia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — export value between Estonia and Ukraine?
- 2.99 1000 USD, with Ukraine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Ukraine?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2021.
- How do Estonia and Ukraine rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — export value?
- Estonia ranks 74th and Ukraine ranks 73rd of 88 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf