Japan vs Nicaragua: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) β Export value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) β Export value over time
- Japan
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 314.94 1000 USD against 189.01 1000 USD in Japan, a difference of 125.93 1000 USD.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.7 times Japan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Japan ranks 57th and Nicaragua ranks 55th of 88 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.59 1000 USD | 85.85 1000 USD | 73.26 1000 USD | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 86.5 1000 USD | 188.66 1000 USD | 102.16 1000 USD | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) β export value, Japan or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 314.94 1000 USD against 189.01 1000 USD in Japan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) β export value between Japan and Nicaragua?
- 125.93 1000 USD, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Nicaragua?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2018.
- How do Japan and Nicaragua rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) β export value?
- Japan ranks 57th and Nicaragua ranks 55th of 88 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) β Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf