Luxembourg vs Senegal: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Export value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Export value over time
- Luxembourg
- Senegal
How they compare
Senegal currently reports 620.42 1000 USD against 618.29 1000 USD in Luxembourg, a difference of 2.13 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Senegal ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 46th and Senegal ranks 45th of 88 countries.
Senegal has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 178.93 1000 USD | 674.28 1000 USD | 495.35 1000 USD | Senegal |
| 2010s | 381.44 1000 USD | 4,534 1000 USD | 4,153 1000 USD | Senegal |
| 2020s | 445.82 1000 USD | 761.39 1000 USD | 315.57 1000 USD | Senegal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — export value, Luxembourg or Senegal?
- Senegal, at 620.42 1000 USD against 618.29 1000 USD in Luxembourg as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — export value between Luxembourg and Senegal?
- 2.13 1000 USD, with Senegal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Senegal?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
- How do Luxembourg and Senegal rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — export value?
- Luxembourg ranks 46th and Senegal ranks 45th of 88 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf