Republic of Moldova vs Tunisia: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Export value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Export value over time
- Republic of Moldova
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 147,802 1000 USD against 2.31 1000 USD in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 147,800 1000 USD.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.
Republic of Moldova ranks 4th and Tunisia ranks 7th of 5 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Moldova | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.29 1000 USD | 397,351 1000 USD | 397,351 1000 USD | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 3.73 1000 USD | 203,504 1000 USD | 203,500 1000 USD | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — export value, Republic of Moldova or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 147,802 1000 USD against 2.31 1000 USD in Republic of Moldova as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — export value between Republic of Moldova and Tunisia?
- 147,800 1000 USD, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Tunisia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2019.
- How do Republic of Moldova and Tunisia rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — export value?
- Republic of Moldova ranks 4th and Tunisia ranks 7th of 5 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf