Austria vs Costa Rica: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity over time
- Austria
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Austria currently reports 34,503 t against 31,124 t in Costa Rica, a difference of 3,379 t.
That makes Austria's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Austria ranks 46th and Costa Rica ranks 48th of 169 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 2 and Costa Rica in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16,679 t | 33,908 t | 17,229 t | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 38,702 t | 32,434 t | 6,268 t | Austria |
| 2020s | 29,497 t | 28,507 t | 990.44 t | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity, Austria or Costa Rica?
- Austria, at 34,503 t against 31,124 t in Costa Rica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity between Austria and Costa Rica?
- 3,379 t, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Costa Rica?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Austria and Costa Rica rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity?
- Austria ranks 46th and Costa Rica ranks 48th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf