Belarus vs Kazakhstan: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity over time
- Belarus
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 66.64 t against 59.72 t in Belarus, a difference of 6.92 t.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 128th and Kazakhstan ranks 127th of 169 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Kazakhstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 161.83 t | 642.54 t | 480.7 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 1,490 t | 275.61 t | 1,214 t | Belarus |
| 2020s | 16,185 t | 46.27 t | 16,139 t | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity, Belarus or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 66.64 t against 59.72 t in Belarus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity between Belarus and Kazakhstan?
- 6.92 t, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Kazakhstan?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Kazakhstan rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity?
- Belarus ranks 128th and Kazakhstan ranks 127th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf