Belize vs Burkina Faso: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity over time
- Belize
- Burkina Faso
How they compare
Belize currently reports 9,616 t against 7,873 t in Burkina Faso, a difference of 1,743 t.
That makes Belize's figure about 1.2 times Burkina Faso's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Belize ahead.
Belize ranks 74th and Burkina Faso ranks 77th of 169 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 2 and Burkina Faso in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Burkina Faso | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6,620 t | 3,707 t | 2,913 t | Belize |
| 2010s | 7,696 t | 7,448 t | 247.83 t | Belize |
| 2020s | 6,954 t | 8,466 t | 1,512 t | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity, Belize or Burkina Faso?
- Belize, at 9,616 t against 7,873 t in Burkina Faso as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity between Belize and Burkina Faso?
- 1,743 t, with Belize ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Burkina Faso?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Belize and Burkina Faso rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity?
- Belize ranks 74th and Burkina Faso ranks 77th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf