Botswana vs Kazakhstan: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity over time
- Botswana
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 74.1 t against 66.64 t in Kazakhstan, a difference of 7.46 t.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 126th and Kazakhstan ranks 127th of 169 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 97.88 t | 642.54 t | 544.66 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 5.78 t | 305.53 t | 299.75 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 19.01 t | 41.18 t | 22.17 t | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity, Botswana or Kazakhstan?
- Botswana, at 74.1 t against 66.64 t in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity between Botswana and Kazakhstan?
- 7.46 t, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Kazakhstan?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Kazakhstan rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity?
- Botswana ranks 126th and Kazakhstan ranks 127th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf