Burkina Faso vs Uganda: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity over time
- Burkina Faso
- Uganda
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 7,873 t against 6,666 t in Uganda, a difference of 1,207 t.
That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.2 times Uganda's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Uganda ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 70th and Uganda ranks 71st of 158 countries.
Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,707 t | 1,014 t | 2,694 t | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 7,448 t | 2,427 t | 5,021 t | Burkina Faso |
| 2020s | 8,466 t | 4,239 t | 4,226 t | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity, Burkina Faso or Uganda?
- Burkina Faso, at 7,873 t against 6,666 t in Uganda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity between Burkina Faso and Uganda?
- 1,207 t, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Uganda?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Burkina Faso and Uganda rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity?
- Burkina Faso ranks 70th and Uganda ranks 71st of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf