Burundi vs Costa Rica: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity over time
- Burundi
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 31,124 t against 29,128 t in Burundi, a difference of 1,996 t.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Burundi's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Burundi ranks 48th and Costa Rica ranks 45th of 158 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 379.32 t | 31,107 t | 30,728 t | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 1,608 t | 34,016 t | 32,408 t | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 14,570 t | 30,243 t | 15,673 t | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity, Burundi or Costa Rica?
- Costa Rica, at 31,124 t against 29,128 t in Burundi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity between Burundi and Costa Rica?
- 1,996 t, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Costa Rica?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Burundi and Costa Rica rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity?
- Burundi ranks 48th and Costa Rica ranks 45th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf