China, Hong Kong SAR vs Togo: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Togo
How they compare
Togo currently reports 2.8 t against 0.7 t in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 2.1 t.
That makes Togo's figure about 4.0 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Togo has been ahead every year.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 159th and Togo ranks 156th of 169 countries.
Togo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.47 t | 10,942 t | 10,940 t | Togo |
| 2020s | 0.7 t | 2.8 t | 2.1 t | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity, China, Hong Kong SAR or Togo?
- Togo, at 2.8 t against 0.7 t in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity between China, Hong Kong SAR and Togo?
- 2.1 t, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Togo?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2024.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Togo rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 159th and Togo ranks 156th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf