Costa Rica vs Myanmar: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity
Costa Rica
31,124 t
in 2024
Myanmar
29,780 t
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
48th
Myanmar rank
50th
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity over time
- Costa Rica
- Myanmar
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 31,124 t against 29,780 t in Myanmar, a difference of 1,344 t.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 48th and Myanmar ranks 50th of 169 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40,381 t | 34.43 t | 40,347 t | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 30,078 t | 2,367 t | 27,710 t | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 28,507 t | 18,703 t | 9,803 t | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity, Costa Rica or Myanmar?
- Costa Rica, at 31,124 t against 29,780 t in Myanmar as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity between Costa Rica and Myanmar?
- 1,344 t, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Myanmar?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Myanmar rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity?
- Costa Rica ranks 48th and Myanmar ranks 50th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf