Costa Rica vs Slovenia: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity over time
- Costa Rica
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 38,516 t against 31,124 t in Costa Rica, a difference of 7,392 t.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.2 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 48th and Slovenia ranks 45th of 169 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33,908 t | 18.38 t | 33,890 t | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 32,434 t | 1,994 t | 30,440 t | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 28,507 t | 20,277 t | 8,229 t | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity, Costa Rica or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 38,516 t against 31,124 t in Costa Rica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity between Costa Rica and Slovenia?
- 7,392 t, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Slovenia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Slovenia rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity?
- Costa Rica ranks 48th and Slovenia ranks 45th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf