El Salvador vs Namibia: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity over time
- El Salvador
- Namibia
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 23,243 t against 17,471 t in Namibia, a difference of 5,772 t.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.3 times Namibia's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.
El Salvador ranks 53rd and Namibia ranks 56th of 158 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17,048 t | 61.81 t | 16,986 t | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 29,089 t | 5.7 t | 29,083 t | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 26,034 t | 5,914 t | 20,120 t | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity, El Salvador or Namibia?
- El Salvador, at 23,243 t against 17,471 t in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity between El Salvador and Namibia?
- 5,772 t, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Namibia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do El Salvador and Namibia rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity?
- El Salvador ranks 53rd and Namibia ranks 56th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf