El Salvador vs Portugal: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity over time
- El Salvador
- Portugal
How they compare
Portugal currently reports 23,395 t against 23,243 t in El Salvador, a difference of 152 t.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Portugal ahead.
El Salvador ranks 57th and Portugal ranks 56th of 169 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 2 and Portugal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18,244 t | 27,416 t | 9,172 t | Portugal |
| 2010s | 29,377 t | 27,721 t | 1,657 t | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 26,034 t | 23,842 t | 2,192 t | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity, El Salvador or Portugal?
- Portugal, at 23,395 t against 23,243 t in El Salvador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity between El Salvador and Portugal?
- 152 t, with Portugal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Portugal?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do El Salvador and Portugal rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity?
- El Salvador ranks 57th and Portugal ranks 56th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf