Eswatini vs Mauritius: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity over time
- Eswatini
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 403.17 t against 338.68 t in Eswatini, a difference of 64.49 t.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.2 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 111th and Mauritius ranks 109th of 169 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 584.25 t | 744.63 t | 160.38 t | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 264.53 t | 5,735 t | 5,471 t | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 338.68 t | 2,251 t | 1,912 t | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity, Eswatini or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 403.17 t against 338.68 t in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity between Eswatini and Mauritius?
- 64.49 t, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Mauritius?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2021.
- How do Eswatini and Mauritius rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity?
- Eswatini ranks 111th and Mauritius ranks 109th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf