Ethiopia vs Saint Lucia: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity over time
- Ethiopia
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 12.31 t against 11 t in Ethiopia, a difference of 1.31 t.
That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Ethiopia ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 131st and Saint Lucia ranks 130th of 158 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 2 and Saint Lucia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2 t | 0.5 t | 1.5 t | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 109,474 t | 5.42 t | 109,469 t | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 3.11 t | 12.31 t | 9.2 t | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity, Ethiopia or Saint Lucia?
- Saint Lucia, at 12.31 t against 11 t in Ethiopia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity between Ethiopia and Saint Lucia?
- 1.31 t, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Saint Lucia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2020.
- How do Ethiopia and Saint Lucia rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity?
- Ethiopia ranks 131st and Saint Lucia ranks 130th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf