Georgia vs South Africa: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity over time
- Georgia
- South Africa
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 515.97 t against 505.64 t in South Africa, a difference of 10.33 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was South Africa ahead.
Georgia ranks 96th and South Africa ranks 97th of 158 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.43 t | 26,735 t | 26,733 t | South Africa |
| 2010s | 3.72 t | 10,676 t | 10,672 t | South Africa |
| 2020s | 279.96 t | 10,272 t | 9,992 t | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity, Georgia or South Africa?
- Georgia, at 515.97 t against 505.64 t in South Africa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity between Georgia and South Africa?
- 10.33 t, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and South Africa?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and South Africa rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity?
- Georgia ranks 96th and South Africa ranks 97th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf