Guatemala vs Libya: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity over time
- Guatemala
- Libya
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 95,199 t against 90,248 t in Libya, a difference of 4,951 t.
That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Libya ahead.
Guatemala ranks 29th and Libya ranks 30th of 169 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56,447 t | 39,580 t | 16,868 t | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 70,921 t | 35,448 t | 35,473 t | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 77,921 t | 42,444 t | 35,478 t | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity, Guatemala or Libya?
- Guatemala, at 95,199 t against 90,248 t in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity between Guatemala and Libya?
- 4,951 t, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Libya?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Guatemala and Libya rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity?
- Guatemala ranks 29th and Libya ranks 30th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf