Libya vs Republic of Korea: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity over time
- Libya
- Republic of Korea
How they compare
Libya currently reports 90,248 t against 86,191 t in Republic of Korea, a difference of 4,057 t.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 30th and Republic of Korea ranks 32nd of 169 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Republic of Korea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Republic of Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39,580 t | 32,025 t | 7,555 t | Libya |
| 2010s | 35,448 t | 77,947 t | 42,499 t | Republic of Korea |
| 2020s | 42,444 t | 88,965 t | 46,522 t | Republic of Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity, Libya or Republic of Korea?
- Libya, at 90,248 t against 86,191 t in Republic of Korea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity between Libya and Republic of Korea?
- 4,057 t, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Republic of Korea?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Republic of Korea rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import quantity?
- Libya ranks 30th and Republic of Korea ranks 32nd of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf