Angola vs Burkina Faso: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value over time
- Angola
- Burkina Faso
How they compare
Angola currently reports 2,935 1000 USD against 2,823 1000 USD in Burkina Faso, a difference of 112 1000 USD.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Burkina Faso has been ahead every year.
Angola ranks 84th and Burkina Faso ranks 87th of 169 countries.
Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Burkina Faso | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.05 1000 USD | 2,608 1000 USD | 2,578 1000 USD | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 346.47 1000 USD | 4,117 1000 USD | 3,770 1000 USD | Burkina Faso |
| 2020s | 1,227 1000 USD | 3,293 1000 USD | 2,066 1000 USD | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value, Angola or Burkina Faso?
- Angola, at 2,935 1000 USD against 2,823 1000 USD in Burkina Faso as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value between Angola and Burkina Faso?
- 112 1000 USD, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Burkina Faso?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Angola and Burkina Faso rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value?
- Angola ranks 84th and Burkina Faso ranks 87th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf