Angola vs Switzerland: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value over time
- Angola
- Switzerland
How they compare
Angola currently reports 2,935 1000 USD against 2,891 1000 USD in Switzerland, a difference of 44 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Switzerland ahead.
Angola ranks 84th and Switzerland ranks 86th of 169 countries.
Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.91 1000 USD | 2,154 1000 USD | 2,130 1000 USD | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 346.47 1000 USD | 3,048 1000 USD | 2,701 1000 USD | Switzerland |
| 2020s | 1,569 1000 USD | 2,992 1000 USD | 1,423 1000 USD | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value, Angola or Switzerland?
- Angola, at 2,935 1000 USD against 2,891 1000 USD in Switzerland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value between Angola and Switzerland?
- 44 1000 USD, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Switzerland?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Angola and Switzerland rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value?
- Angola ranks 84th and Switzerland ranks 86th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf