Australia vs Poland: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value over time
- Australia
- Poland
How they compare
Australia currently reports 161,699 1000 USD against 126,746 1000 USD in Poland, a difference of 34,953 1000 USD.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.3 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 13th and Poland ranks 16th of 169 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 88,694 1000 USD | 2,571 1000 USD | 86,123 1000 USD | Australia |
| 2010s | 92,030 1000 USD | 19,737 1000 USD | 72,294 1000 USD | Australia |
| 2020s | 108,425 1000 USD | 74,513 1000 USD | 33,912 1000 USD | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value, Australia or Poland?
- Australia, at 161,699 1000 USD against 126,746 1000 USD in Poland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value between Australia and Poland?
- 34,953 1000 USD, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Poland?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Australia and Poland rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value?
- Australia ranks 13th and Poland ranks 16th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf