Austria vs Uruguay: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value over time
- Austria
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 27,076 1000 USD against 23,791 1000 USD in Austria, a difference of 3,285 1000 USD.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Austria's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 45th and Uruguay ranks 42nd of 169 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5,984 1000 USD | 41,320 1000 USD | 35,336 1000 USD | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 19,724 1000 USD | 49,872 1000 USD | 30,147 1000 USD | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 19,764 1000 USD | 35,491 1000 USD | 15,728 1000 USD | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value, Austria or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 27,076 1000 USD against 23,791 1000 USD in Austria as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value between Austria and Uruguay?
- 3,285 1000 USD, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Uruguay?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Austria and Uruguay rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value?
- Austria ranks 45th and Uruguay ranks 42nd of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf