Austria vs Zambia: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value over time
- Austria
- Zambia
How they compare
Austria currently reports 23,791 1000 USD against 21,716 1000 USD in Zambia, a difference of 2,075 1000 USD.
That makes Austria's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 45th and Zambia ranks 47th of 169 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6,145 1000 USD | 636.14 1000 USD | 5,509 1000 USD | Austria |
| 2010s | 19,724 1000 USD | 3,961 1000 USD | 15,763 1000 USD | Austria |
| 2020s | 18,757 1000 USD | 11,445 1000 USD | 7,312 1000 USD | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value, Austria or Zambia?
- Austria, at 23,791 1000 USD against 21,716 1000 USD in Zambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value between Austria and Zambia?
- 2,075 1000 USD, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Zambia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Zambia rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value?
- Austria ranks 45th and Zambia ranks 47th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf