Bahamas vs Guyana: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value over time
- Bahamas
- Guyana
How they compare
Bahamas currently reports 49.56 1000 USD against 46.43 1000 USD in Guyana, a difference of 3.13 1000 USD.
That makes Bahamas's figure about 1.1 times Guyana's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Guyana ahead.
Bahamas ranks 128th and Guyana ranks 129th of 169 countries.
Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Guyana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.88 1000 USD | 310.48 1000 USD | 308.6 1000 USD | Guyana |
| 2010s | 1.38 1000 USD | 167.53 1000 USD | 166.15 1000 USD | Guyana |
| 2020s | 18.45 1000 USD | 213.88 1000 USD | 195.43 1000 USD | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value, Bahamas or Guyana?
- Bahamas, at 49.56 1000 USD against 46.43 1000 USD in Guyana as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value between Bahamas and Guyana?
- 3.13 1000 USD, with Bahamas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Guyana?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Bahamas and Guyana rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value?
- Bahamas ranks 128th and Guyana ranks 129th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf