Belarus vs Gabon: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value over time
- Belarus
- Gabon
How they compare
Gabon currently reports 326.58 1000 USD against 295.9 1000 USD in Belarus, a difference of 30.68 1000 USD.
That makes Gabon's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Gabon ahead.
Belarus ranks 113th and Gabon ranks 110th of 169 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Gabon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 185.91 1000 USD | 140.49 1000 USD | 45.42 1000 USD | Belarus |
| 2010s | 417.65 1000 USD | 204.49 1000 USD | 213.16 1000 USD | Belarus |
| 2020s | 12,347 1000 USD | 822.89 1000 USD | 11,524 1000 USD | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value, Belarus or Gabon?
- Gabon, at 326.58 1000 USD against 295.9 1000 USD in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value between Belarus and Gabon?
- 30.68 1000 USD, with Gabon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Gabon?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Gabon rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value?
- Belarus ranks 113th and Gabon ranks 110th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf