Belarus vs Mauritius: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value over time
- Belarus
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 305.51 1000 USD against 295.9 1000 USD in Belarus, a difference of 9.61 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 113th and Mauritius ranks 112th of 169 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 187.81 1000 USD | 541.33 1000 USD | 353.52 1000 USD | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 757.07 1000 USD | 2,881 1000 USD | 2,124 1000 USD | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 9,937 1000 USD | 618.89 1000 USD | 9,318 1000 USD | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value, Belarus or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 305.51 1000 USD against 295.9 1000 USD in Belarus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value between Belarus and Mauritius?
- 9.61 1000 USD, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Mauritius?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Mauritius rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value?
- Belarus ranks 113th and Mauritius ranks 112th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf