Botswana vs Guyana: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value over time
- Botswana
- Guyana
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 46.43 1000 USD against 43.98 1000 USD in Botswana, a difference of 2.45 1000 USD.
That makes Guyana's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Guyana has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 132nd and Guyana ranks 129th of 169 countries.
Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Guyana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69.49 1000 USD | 330.11 1000 USD | 260.62 1000 USD | Guyana |
| 2010s | 34.6 1000 USD | 531.3 1000 USD | 496.7 1000 USD | Guyana |
| 2020s | 11.97 1000 USD | 255.74 1000 USD | 243.77 1000 USD | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value, Botswana or Guyana?
- Guyana, at 46.43 1000 USD against 43.98 1000 USD in Botswana as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value between Botswana and Guyana?
- 2.45 1000 USD, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Guyana?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Guyana rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value?
- Botswana ranks 132nd and Guyana ranks 129th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf