Botswana vs Qatar: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value over time
- Botswana
- Qatar
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 43.98 1000 USD against 39.5 1000 USD in Qatar, a difference of 4.48 1000 USD.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Qatar's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 132nd and Qatar ranks 133rd of 169 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Qatar in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 115.82 1000 USD | 1.84 1000 USD | 113.98 1000 USD | Botswana |
| 2010s | 2.86 1000 USD | 16.01 1000 USD | 13.15 1000 USD | Qatar |
| 2020s | 11.97 1000 USD | 228.28 1000 USD | 216.3 1000 USD | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value, Botswana or Qatar?
- Botswana, at 43.98 1000 USD against 39.5 1000 USD in Qatar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value between Botswana and Qatar?
- 4.48 1000 USD, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Qatar?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Qatar rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value?
- Botswana ranks 132nd and Qatar ranks 133rd of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf