Brazil vs Poland: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value over time
- Brazil
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 126,746 1000 USD against 115,707 1000 USD in Brazil, a difference of 11,039 1000 USD.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 19th and Poland ranks 16th of 169 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 137,906 1000 USD | 2,571 1000 USD | 135,336 1000 USD | Brazil |
| 2010s | 227,386 1000 USD | 19,737 1000 USD | 207,649 1000 USD | Brazil |
| 2020s | 168,826 1000 USD | 74,513 1000 USD | 94,313 1000 USD | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value, Brazil or Poland?
- Poland, at 126,746 1000 USD against 115,707 1000 USD in Brazil as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value between Brazil and Poland?
- 11,039 1000 USD, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Poland?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Poland rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value?
- Brazil ranks 19th and Poland ranks 16th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf