Burundi vs Nicaragua: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value over time
- Burundi
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 19,867 1000 USD against 18,976 1000 USD in Nicaragua, a difference of 891 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Burundi ranks 51st and Nicaragua ranks 53rd of 169 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 234.46 1000 USD | 7,407 1000 USD | 7,173 1000 USD | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 1,103 1000 USD | 9,240 1000 USD | 8,137 1000 USD | Nicaragua |
| 2020s | 9,936 1000 USD | 14,896 1000 USD | 4,960 1000 USD | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value, Burundi or Nicaragua?
- Burundi, at 19,867 1000 USD against 18,976 1000 USD in Nicaragua as of 2023.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value between Burundi and Nicaragua?
- 891 1000 USD, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Nicaragua?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Burundi and Nicaragua rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value?
- Burundi ranks 51st and Nicaragua ranks 53rd of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf