Canada vs Nepal: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value over time
- Canada
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 100,343 1000 USD against 86,793 1000 USD in Canada, a difference of 13,550 1000 USD.
That makes Nepal's figure about 1.2 times Canada's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 23rd and Nepal ranks 21st of 169 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25,182 1000 USD | 7,191 1000 USD | 17,992 1000 USD | Canada |
| 2010s | 42,336 1000 USD | 49,317 1000 USD | 6,980 1000 USD | Nepal |
| 2020s | 42,083 1000 USD | 69,802 1000 USD | 27,719 1000 USD | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value, Canada or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 100,343 1000 USD against 86,793 1000 USD in Canada as of 2022.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value between Canada and Nepal?
- 13,550 1000 USD, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Nepal?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do Canada and Nepal rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value?
- Canada ranks 23rd and Nepal ranks 21st of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf