Congo vs South Africa: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value over time
- Congo
- South Africa
How they compare
Congo currently reports 815.98 1000 USD against 699.99 1000 USD in South Africa, a difference of 115.99 1000 USD.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.2 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Africa ahead.
Congo ranks 92nd and South Africa ranks 94th of 158 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 59.07 1000 USD | 5,726 1000 USD | 5,667 1000 USD | South Africa |
| 2020s | 465.78 1000 USD | 9,009 1000 USD | 8,544 1000 USD | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value, Congo or South Africa?
- Congo, at 815.98 1000 USD against 699.99 1000 USD in South Africa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value between Congo and South Africa?
- 115.99 1000 USD, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and South Africa?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Congo and South Africa rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value?
- Congo ranks 92nd and South Africa ranks 94th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf