Costa Rica vs Zambia: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value over time
- Costa Rica
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 21,716 1000 USD against 20,897 1000 USD in Costa Rica, a difference of 819 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 48th and Zambia ranks 47th of 169 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14,087 1000 USD | 636.14 1000 USD | 13,451 1000 USD | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 16,464 1000 USD | 3,961 1000 USD | 12,502 1000 USD | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 17,413 1000 USD | 11,445 1000 USD | 5,968 1000 USD | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value, Costa Rica or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 21,716 1000 USD against 20,897 1000 USD in Costa Rica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value between Costa Rica and Zambia?
- 819 1000 USD, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Zambia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Zambia rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value?
- Costa Rica ranks 48th and Zambia ranks 47th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf