Croatia vs Latvia: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value over time
- Croatia
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 9,390 1000 USD against 8,518 1000 USD in Croatia, a difference of 872 1000 USD.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 71st and Latvia ranks 69th of 169 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 144.78 1000 USD | 563.51 1000 USD | 418.73 1000 USD | Latvia |
| 2010s | 14,502 1000 USD | 655.2 1000 USD | 13,847 1000 USD | Croatia |
| 2020s | 6,173 1000 USD | 5,579 1000 USD | 594.05 1000 USD | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value, Croatia or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 9,390 1000 USD against 8,518 1000 USD in Croatia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value between Croatia and Latvia?
- 872 1000 USD, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Latvia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Croatia and Latvia rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value?
- Croatia ranks 71st and Latvia ranks 69th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf