Croatia vs Panama: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value over time
- Croatia
- Panama
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 8,518 1000 USD against 8,126 1000 USD in Panama, a difference of 392 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Panama ahead.
Croatia ranks 71st and Panama ranks 72nd of 169 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Panama in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 144.78 1000 USD | 465.79 1000 USD | 321.01 1000 USD | Panama |
| 2010s | 14,502 1000 USD | 3,575 1000 USD | 10,927 1000 USD | Croatia |
| 2020s | 6,173 1000 USD | 8,410 1000 USD | 2,237 1000 USD | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value, Croatia or Panama?
- Croatia, at 8,518 1000 USD against 8,126 1000 USD in Panama as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value between Croatia and Panama?
- 392 1000 USD, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Panama?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Croatia and Panama rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value?
- Croatia ranks 71st and Panama ranks 72nd of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf