Cuba vs Singapore: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value over time
- Cuba
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 64.67 1000 USD against 60.46 1000 USD in Cuba, a difference of 4.21 1000 USD.
That makes Singapore's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 126th and Singapore ranks 125th of 169 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,052 1000 USD | 102.94 1000 USD | 2,950 1000 USD | Cuba |
| 2010s | 4,334 1000 USD | 182.7 1000 USD | 4,152 1000 USD | Cuba |
| 2020s | 840.73 1000 USD | 121.55 1000 USD | 719.18 1000 USD | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value, Cuba or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 64.67 1000 USD against 60.46 1000 USD in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value between Cuba and Singapore?
- 4.21 1000 USD, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Singapore?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Singapore rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value?
- Cuba ranks 126th and Singapore ranks 125th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf