Cuba vs Saint Lucia: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value over time
- Cuba
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 60.46 1000 USD against 45.06 1000 USD in Saint Lucia, a difference of 15.4 1000 USD.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.3 times Saint Lucia's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 117th and Saint Lucia ranks 120th of 158 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4,337 1000 USD | 0.17 1000 USD | 4,337 1000 USD | Cuba |
| 2010s | 4,203 1000 USD | 16.03 1000 USD | 4,187 1000 USD | Cuba |
| 2020s | 1,865 1000 USD | 45.06 1000 USD | 1,820 1000 USD | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value, Cuba or Saint Lucia?
- Cuba, at 60.46 1000 USD against 45.06 1000 USD in Saint Lucia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value between Cuba and Saint Lucia?
- 15.4 1000 USD, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Saint Lucia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2020.
- How do Cuba and Saint Lucia rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value?
- Cuba ranks 117th and Saint Lucia ranks 120th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf