Czechia vs Jordan: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value over time
- Czechia
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 1,540 1000 USD against 1,265 1000 USD in Czechia, a difference of 275 1000 USD.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.2 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 93rd and Jordan ranks 90th of 169 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 2 and Jordan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,104 1000 USD | 23.6 1000 USD | 1,081 1000 USD | Czechia |
| 2010s | 3,586 1000 USD | 12.18 1000 USD | 3,574 1000 USD | Czechia |
| 2020s | 2,441 1000 USD | 3,595 1000 USD | 1,154 1000 USD | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value, Czechia or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 1,540 1000 USD against 1,265 1000 USD in Czechia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value between Czechia and Jordan?
- 275 1000 USD, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Jordan?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Czechia and Jordan rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value?
- Czechia ranks 93rd and Jordan ranks 90th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf