Ecuador vs Greece: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value over time
- Ecuador
- Greece
How they compare
Greece currently reports 11,092 1000 USD against 10,102 1000 USD in Ecuador, a difference of 990 1000 USD.
That makes Greece's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 67th and Greece ranks 64th of 169 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Greece | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21,195 1000 USD | 5,369 1000 USD | 15,826 1000 USD | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 34,174 1000 USD | 3,456 1000 USD | 30,718 1000 USD | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 22,751 1000 USD | 7,102 1000 USD | 15,649 1000 USD | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value, Ecuador or Greece?
- Greece, at 11,092 1000 USD against 10,102 1000 USD in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value between Ecuador and Greece?
- 990 1000 USD, with Greece ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Greece?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Greece rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value?
- Ecuador ranks 67th and Greece ranks 64th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf