Ecuador vs Malawi: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value over time
- Ecuador
- Malawi
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 10,102 1000 USD against 8,583 1000 USD in Malawi, a difference of 1,519 1000 USD.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.2 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 67th and Malawi ranks 70th of 169 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21,195 1000 USD | 2,164 1000 USD | 19,031 1000 USD | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 34,174 1000 USD | 6,645 1000 USD | 27,529 1000 USD | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 22,751 1000 USD | 10,221 1000 USD | 12,530 1000 USD | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value, Ecuador or Malawi?
- Ecuador, at 10,102 1000 USD against 8,583 1000 USD in Malawi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value between Ecuador and Malawi?
- 1,519 1000 USD, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Malawi?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Malawi rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value?
- Ecuador ranks 67th and Malawi ranks 70th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf