Egypt vs Eswatini: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value over time
- Egypt
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 190.6 1000 USD against 176.9 1000 USD in Egypt, a difference of 13.7 1000 USD.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Egypt's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Egypt ahead.
Egypt ranks 120th and Eswatini ranks 119th of 169 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 2 and Eswatini in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 451.63 1000 USD | 285.63 1000 USD | 166 1000 USD | Egypt |
| 2010s | 183.44 1000 USD | 122 1000 USD | 61.44 1000 USD | Egypt |
| 2020s | 160.83 1000 USD | 190.6 1000 USD | 29.77 1000 USD | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value, Egypt or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 190.6 1000 USD against 176.9 1000 USD in Egypt as of 2021.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value between Egypt and Eswatini?
- 13.7 1000 USD, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Eswatini?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2021.
- How do Egypt and Eswatini rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value?
- Egypt ranks 120th and Eswatini ranks 119th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf