Eritrea vs Kazakhstan: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value over time
- Eritrea
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 44.32 1000 USD against 38.63 1000 USD in Eritrea, a difference of 5.69 1000 USD.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Eritrea's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 134th and Kazakhstan ranks 131st of 169 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,261 1000 USD | 489.48 1000 USD | 771.44 1000 USD | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 19.38 1000 USD | 63.92 1000 USD | 44.55 1000 USD | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value, Eritrea or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 44.32 1000 USD against 38.63 1000 USD in Eritrea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value between Eritrea and Kazakhstan?
- 5.69 1000 USD, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Kazakhstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2018.
- How do Eritrea and Kazakhstan rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value?
- Eritrea ranks 134th and Kazakhstan ranks 131st of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf