Ethiopia vs Malta: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value over time
- Ethiopia
- Malta
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 12.21 1000 USD against 11.4 1000 USD in Malta, a difference of 0.81 1000 USD.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Malta ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 145th and Malta ranks 147th of 169 countries.
Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50,600 1000 USD | 2.18 1000 USD | 50,597 1000 USD | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 90,203 1000 USD | 6.51 1000 USD | 90,197 1000 USD | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 10.86 1000 USD | 5.25 1000 USD | 5.6 1000 USD | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value, Ethiopia or Malta?
- Ethiopia, at 12.21 1000 USD against 11.4 1000 USD in Malta as of 2023.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value between Ethiopia and Malta?
- 0.81 1000 USD, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Malta?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Malta rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value?
- Ethiopia ranks 145th and Malta ranks 147th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf