Guyana vs Saint Lucia: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value over time
- Guyana
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 46.43 1000 USD against 45.06 1000 USD in Saint Lucia, a difference of 1.37 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Guyana ahead.
Guyana ranks 129th and Saint Lucia ranks 130th of 169 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guyana averaged higher in 2 and Saint Lucia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 167.26 1000 USD | 0.17 1000 USD | 167.09 1000 USD | Guyana |
| 2010s | 482.72 1000 USD | 17.73 1000 USD | 464.99 1000 USD | Guyana |
| 2020s | 24.86 1000 USD | 45.06 1000 USD | 20.2 1000 USD | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value, Guyana or Saint Lucia?
- Guyana, at 46.43 1000 USD against 45.06 1000 USD in Saint Lucia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value between Guyana and Saint Lucia?
- 1.37 1000 USD, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Saint Lucia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2020.
- How do Guyana and Saint Lucia rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value?
- Guyana ranks 129th and Saint Lucia ranks 130th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf