Indonesia vs Japan: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value over time
- Indonesia
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 209,021 1000 USD against 173,301 1000 USD in Indonesia, a difference of 35,720 1000 USD.
That makes Japan's figure about 1.2 times Indonesia's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Indonesia ranks 11th and Japan ranks 8th of 169 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11,688 1000 USD | 178,593 1000 USD | 166,904 1000 USD | Japan |
| 2010s | 106,410 1000 USD | 186,810 1000 USD | 80,400 1000 USD | Japan |
| 2020s | 176,954 1000 USD | 233,504 1000 USD | 56,551 1000 USD | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value, Indonesia or Japan?
- Japan, at 209,021 1000 USD against 173,301 1000 USD in Indonesia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value between Indonesia and Japan?
- 35,720 1000 USD, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Japan?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Indonesia and Japan rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value?
- Indonesia ranks 11th and Japan ranks 8th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf