Israel vs Suriname: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value over time
- Israel
- Suriname
How they compare
Israel currently reports 10 1000 USD against 7.48 1000 USD in Suriname, a difference of 2.52 1000 USD.
That makes Israel's figure about 1.3 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Israel ahead.
Israel ranks 149th and Suriname ranks 151st of 169 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15 1000 USD | 15.96 1000 USD | 0.96 1000 USD | Suriname |
| 2010s | 41 1000 USD | 10.65 1000 USD | 30.35 1000 USD | Israel |
| 2020s | 8.67 1000 USD | 20.56 1000 USD | 11.9 1000 USD | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value, Israel or Suriname?
- Israel, at 10 1000 USD against 7.48 1000 USD in Suriname as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value between Israel and Suriname?
- 2.52 1000 USD, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Suriname?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Israel and Suriname rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value?
- Israel ranks 149th and Suriname ranks 151st of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf