Italy vs New Zealand: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value over time
- Italy
- New Zealand
How they compare
Italy currently reports 129,138 1000 USD against 126,066 1000 USD in New Zealand, a difference of 3,072 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Italy ahead.
Italy ranks 15th and New Zealand ranks 17th of 169 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 99,065 1000 USD | 66,992 1000 USD | 32,072 1000 USD | Italy |
| 2010s | 120,140 1000 USD | 110,783 1000 USD | 9,357 1000 USD | Italy |
| 2020s | 126,656 1000 USD | 126,042 1000 USD | 613.8 1000 USD | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value, Italy or New Zealand?
- Italy, at 129,138 1000 USD against 126,066 1000 USD in New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value between Italy and New Zealand?
- 3,072 1000 USD, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and New Zealand?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Italy and New Zealand rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value?
- Italy ranks 15th and New Zealand ranks 17th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf